Review: AMD brings 45nm process and Phenom to bear on dual-core CPUs

by Tarinder Sandhu on 2 June 2009, 00:00 3.6

Tags: AMD Athlon II X2 250, AMD (NYSE:AMD)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qash5

Add to My Vault: x

System setup and notes

System AMD AM2+/AM3 system Intel LGA775 system
Processors AMD Athlon II X2 250 (3.0GHz, 2MB L2 cache, AM3, dual-core) £60 - estimated
AMD Athlon X2 7850 Black Edition (2.8GHz, 1MB L2 cache, 2MB L3 cache, AM2+, dual-core)  £53
AMD Athlon X2 7750 Black Edition (2.7GHz, 1MB L2 cache, 2MB L3 cache, AM2+, dual-core)  £46
AMD Athlon X2 6000+ (3.1GHz, 1MB L2 cache, AM2, dual-core) £55
Intel Pentium Dual Core E5200 (2.5GHz, 2MB L2 cache, LGA775, dual-core)  £52
Motherboard Gigabyte MA790GP-DS4H (790GX + SB750) Foxconn P45A-S (Intel P45 + ICH10R)
Memory

4GB (2 x 2GB) Corsair PC8500 

Memory timings and speed

4-4-4-12 2T @ 800MHz

Graphics card(s) Sapphire Radeon HD 4830 512MB
Disk drive(s) Seagate 500GB SATAII (ST3500320AS)
Optical drive(s) Sony DW-Q30A
BIOS revision F4 (07/04/2009) P05 (27/08/2008)
Mainboard software Standard Vista SP1 drivers + AHCI 3.1.1540.64 Intel Inf 9.0.0.1008
Graphics driver ATI Catalyst 8.12 
Operating system Windows Vista Business, SP1 64-bit
PSU Dark Power 430W Dark Power 430W
Monitor Dell 2405FPW

Software

Benchmarks

ScienceMark Memory Latency
Sandra Lite XII SP2c Win64 memory bandwidth float buffered
HEXUS.PiFast calculation to 10m places
HEXUS DivX 6.8.3 + Lame encoding enhanced multithreading on + SSE4 search off
CINEBENCH R10 multi-CPU render 64-bit
POV-Ray 64-bit 3.7.0 beta 25a

DivX 6.8.3 + Lame + QuickTime 7.5.5 (multitasking)
DivX 6.8.3 + Lame  + ET: QW, v1.5, 1,680x1,050 smp off (multitasking) 

Company of Heroes: OF v2.103, DX9, 1,024x768 - low quality
ET: QW, v1.5, 1,024x768 smp off, and 1,680x1,050 high-detail settings.

Power-draw readings


Notes

We've deliberately not included any CPU - or any component, for that matter - costing over £100 because this is a strictly a mid-range look. Out go quad-core CPUs from both Intel and AMD, which start at over £100. Indeed, none of the five chips costs more than £60, and we've added numbers for an older-generation Athlon 64 X2 that runs at a touch higher clock-speed than X2 250.

Of particular interest are the multitasking results, to see if budget CPUs can handle a more than isolation benchmarking.

The AMD chips have been run on an AM2+ 790GX board with cheaper DDR2, at 800MHz speeds, to keep platform costs low. We also look at DDR2-1,066 performance a little later on.

Our thanks to Scan.co.uk for providing the comparison Intel CPU at short notice