Review: Inno3D GeForce GTX 260 OC vs. Gigabyte Radeon HD 4870: the aftermath

by Parm Mann on 27 January 2009, 12:57 2.8

Tags: GeForce GTX 260 OC, Radeon HD 4870 1024MB (Cat 9.3), Gigabyte (TPE:2376), AMD (NYSE:AMD), NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA), Inno3D, PC

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qaqqs

Add to My Vault: x

Call Of Duty 4: Modern Warfare

Call of Duty 4: MW (high-end) 1,680x1,050 4xAA 16xAF
Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 X2Gigabyte Radeon HD 4870XFX GeForce GTX 280Inno3D GeForce GTX 260 OC
123.3379.4387.8782.43


Call of Duty 4: MW (high-end) 1,920x1,200 4xAA 16xAF
Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 X2Gigabyte Radeon HD 4870XFX GeForce GTX 280Inno3D GeForce GTX 260 OC
104.766.775.2769.23


Call of Duty 4: MW (high-end) 2,560x1,600 4xAA 16xAF
Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 X2Gigabyte Radeon HD 4870XFX GeForce GTX 280Inno3D GeForce GTX 260 OC
67.8343.0750.7746.6


Back in the day, Call of Duty 4 was dubbed a title that favoured AMD-based graphics cards. NVIDIA, to its credit, rectified that interpretation with its "Big Bang II" drivers back in October 2008. As a result of recent driver improvements, we now find Inno3D's GeForce GTX 260 OC edge ahead of GIGABYTE's Radeon HD 4870 1GB - albeit marginally.

Offering a performance boost of between 6-8 per cent, a GeForce GTX 280 looks a sensible upgrade for little extra cash. The only dual-GPU solution on display, Sapphire's Radeon HD 4850 X2, obliterates the competition for an extra £5.