Review: AMD Radeon R9 290X

by Tarinder Sandhu on 24 October 2013, 05:00

Tags: AMD (NYSE:AMD)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qab4cb

Add to My Vault: x

Testing methodology

GPU Comparisons

Graphics Card GPU Clock
(MHz)
Stream
Processors
Shader Clock
(MHz)
Memory Clock
(MHz)
Memory Bus
(bits)
Graphics Driver
AMD Radeon R9 290X 4GB 1,000 2,816 1,000 5,000 512 Catalyst 13.11 v5
AMD Radeon R9 280X 3GB 1,000 2,048 1,000 6,000 384 Catalyst 13.11
AMD Radeon HD 7970 GE 3GB 1,000 (1,050) 2,048 1,000 (1,050) 6,000 384 Catalyst 13.11
AMD Radeon HD 7950 3GB 800 1,792 800 5,000 384 Catalyst 13.11
AMD Radeon R9 270X 2GB 1,050 1,280 1,050 5,600 256 Catalyst 13.11
AMD Radeon HD 7870 2GB 1,000 1,280 1,000 4,800 256 Catalyst 13.11
AMD Radeon R7 260X 2GB 1,100 896 1,100 6,400 128 Catalyst 13.11
Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan 6GB 837 (876) 2,688 836 (875) 6,008 384 GeForce 331.40
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 3GB 863 (900) 2,304 863 (900) 6,008 384 GeForce 331.40
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 2GB 1,046 (1,085) 1,536 1,046 (1,085) 7,012 256 GeForce 331.40
Nvidia GeForce GTX 760 2GB 980 (1,033) 1,152 980 (1,033) 6,008 256 GeForce 331.40
Nvidia GeForce GTX 670 2GB 915 (980) 1,344 915 (980) 6,008 256 GeForce 331.40
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 2GB 980 (1,032) 960 980 (1,032) 6,008 192 GeForce 331.40
Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 2GB 980 (1,032) 768 980 (1,032) 6,008 192 GeForce 331.40

HEXUS Graphics Test Bench

Processor Intel Core i7-4770K (3.50GHz, 8MB cache, quad-core)
CPU Cooler Intel reference E97378-001
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD3H
Memory 16GB G.Skill RipJaws (2x8GB) DDR3 @ 1,600MHz
Power Supply Corsair AX760i
Storage Device Crucial M500 240GB SSD
Chassis Corsair Graphite Series 600T
Monitor Philips Brilliance 272P (2,560x1,440)
Operating system Windows 8 64-bit

HEXUS High-End Benchmark Suite

GPU Benchmarks Mode and Resolutions Quality Settings
3DMark DX11 at 1,920x1,080 and 2,560x1,440 Fire Strike and Fire Strike Extreme
BioShock Infinite DX11 at 1,920x1,080 and 2,560x1,440 Ultra + DOF
Crysis 3 DX11 at 1,920x1,080 and 2,560x1,440 4xMSAA, High Preset
Far Cry 3 DX11 at 1,920x1,080 and 2,560x1,440 2xMSAA, Ultra Preset
GRID 2 DX11 at 1,920x1,080 and 2,560x1,440 4xMSAA, Ultra Preset
Just Cause 2 DX10 at 1,920x1,080 and 2,560x1,440 8xMSAA, High Preset
Total War: Rome II DX11 at 1,920x1,080 and 2,560x1,440 4xMSAA, High Preset
General Benchmarks Description
Power Consumption To emulate real-world usage scenarios, we record mains power draw both when idle and while playing Far Cry 3
Temperature To emulate real-world usage scenarios, we record GPU core temperature both when idle and while playing Far Cry 3
Noise A PCE-318 meter is used to record noise levels when idle and while playing Far Cry 3

Frequency matters

Remember how we mentioned that the R9 290X GPU modulates speed based on target temperature and power consumption? Using the standard quiet mode setting, we played through 10 minutes of intense Far Cry 3 action and logged the per-second GPU frequency, as shown in the graph below.

Note that the GPU doesn't scale up to 1,000MHz at any one-second point. In fact the average speed is 912.5MHz, though it differs from game to game. Just Cause 2, for example, enables the GPU to run at 984MHz while Crysis 3's average speed is 931MHz. The key aspect to understand here is that no two R9 290X cards will perform at exactly the same level, because no two PC systems are exactly alike.

Running the same test with uber mode increased the core frequency by, on average, three per cent. The benchmarks on the following page are run with quiet mode, which is the standard setting for the comparison GeForce cards, but we flicked over to uber mode for overclocking.

We've singled-out the R9 290X and GTX Titan cards in the ensuing graphs, purely because they're the two best GPUs from each company, but do also pay attention to the GTX 780's results - it is closest to the AMD card with respect to price.