Multi-threaded performance
| StaxRip X264 + AAC encoding - pass one | |
|---|---|
| Intel DH55TC (H55) | ASUS P7H57D-V EVO (H57) |
| 287 | 286 |
| StaxRip X264 + AAC encoding - pass two | |
|---|---|
| Intel DH55TC (H55) | ASUS P7H57D-V EVO (H57) |
| 245 | 244 |
One of our newer benchmarks - utilising the popular H.264 encoder - produces incredibly consistent results.
Even so, the one-second gap here equates to less than half a percent difference, so if there's any measurable performance gap between H57 and H55, it's not to be found here.
| CINEBENCH R10 64-bit - multi-CPU render | |
|---|---|
| Intel DH55TC (H55) | ASUS P7H57D-V EVO (H57) |
| 10811 | 10727 |
| Pov-ray 3.7.0 beta 34 - 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel DH55TC (H55) | ASUS P7H57D-V EVO (H57) |
| 2152.71 | 2159.59 |
If 3D modelling/rendering is more your scene, it seems there's also no advantage to H57 over its cheaper H55 cousin. Less than one percent separates the boards in terms of performance.
| wPrime multithreaded - 1024M calculation | |
|---|---|
| Intel DH55TC (H55) | ASUS P7H57D-V EVO (H57) |
| 457 | 454 |
Still a popular benchmark and stress-testing tool among the overclocking community, even wPrime 1,024M fails to highlight any significant performance differentiation between the two.