Memory, 2D, and SATA performance
Memory bandwidth and latency| Sisoft Sandra 2010 (16.26) - aggregate bandwidth | |
|---|---|
| Gigabyte EX58-UD5 | ASUS P6T SE |
| 19.72 | 19.65 |
| Sisoft Sandra 2010 (16.26) - memory latency | |
|---|---|
| Gigabyte EX58-UD5 | ASUS P6T SE |
| 76 | 75 |
Both boards use the same memory and timings, so the lack of difference isn't surprising.
2D performance
| HEXUS.PiFast - calculation to 10m places | |
|---|---|
| Gigabyte EX58-UD5 | ASUS P6T SE |
| 31.6 | 31.53 |
| CINEBENCH R10 64-bit - multi-CPU render | |
|---|---|
| Gigabyte EX58-UD5 | ASUS P6T SE |
| 15815 | 15725 |
The Gigabyte board has a consistent lead in the CINEBENCH R10 64-bit test. You wouldn't be able to visually discern the difference, though.
SATA
| HD Tach v3.0.4.0 SATA average read speed | |
|---|---|
| Gigabyte EX58-UD5 | ASUS P6T SE |
| 212.5 | 208.7 |
| HD Tach v3.0.4.0 SATA burst speed | |
|---|---|
| Gigabyte EX58-UD5 | ASUS P6T SE |
| 229.1 | 232.8 |
The same SATA controllers on both boards mean that disk performance is very similar. Wondering why the numbers are so high? We're using a Kingston SSDNow V+ 128GB SSD.