Testing methodology
Comparison Configurations |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPU | AMD |
Intel |
||||
A10-7850K A10-6800K |
A10-6800K |
Core i3-4330 |
||||
| Motherboard | Gigabyte G1.Sniper A88X |
ASRock FM2A88X-ITX+ |
Gigabyte Z87-D3HP |
|||
| BIOS | A9 |
1.90 |
F5 |
|||
| Chipset Driver | AMD Catalyst 13.12 |
Intel Inf 9.4.0.1027 and IMEI 9 |
||||
| DDR3 Memory | AMD Gamer Series 16GB (2x8GB) |
|||||
| Memory Timings | 10-11-11-28-2T @ 2,133MHz |
9-10-9-27-2T @ 1,866MHz |
||||
| Integrated Graphics | Radeon R7 HD 8670D |
HD 8670D |
HD 4600 |
|||
| IGP driver | AMD Catalyst 13.30 RC3 |
Intel 15.33.8.64.3379 |
||||
| Disk Drive | Samsung 840 Pro 250GB |
|||||
| Power Supply | Corsair AX760i |
|||||
| Operating System | Windows 8.1 Pro 64-bit |
|||||
CPU and Memory Benchmarks |
||||||
| HEXUS PiFast |
Our number-crunching benchmark stresses a single core by calculating Pi to 10m places | |||||
| CineBench R15 | Using Cinebench's multi-CPU render, this cross-platform benchmark stresses all cores | |||||
| wPrime 2.1.0 | Another number-crunching benchmark that stresses all available CPU cores/threads | |||||
Multimedia Benchmarks |
||||||
| LuxMark 2.0 | An OpenCL rendering benchmark | |||||
| MuseMage 1.9.6 | An OpenCL image-manipulation benchmark (64-bit) | |||||
| HandBrake 0.9.9.1 | Free-to-use video encoder that stresses all CPU cores (64-bit) | |||||
System Benchmarks |
||||||
| PCMark 8 v2.0 | System-wide examination that uses the Home preset, run with OpenCL acceleration | |||||
| 3DMark | DX11, run at the Firestrike default test | |||||
| SiSoft Sandra 2014 | Aggregate score that takes a composite of 12 system-wide benchmarks | |||||
IO Benchmarks |
||||||
| AS SSD | Sequential read and write speeds for SATA drive | |||||
| AS SSD | Sequential read and write speeds for USB 3.0 | |||||
Gaming Benchmarks |
||||||
| BioShock Infinite | DX9, 1,280x720 and 1,920x1,080 medium quality | |||||
| GRID 2 | DX9, 1,280x720 and 1,920x1,080 high quality | |||||
| Total War: Rome II | DX9, 1,280x720 and 1,920x1,080 medium quality | |||||
Miscellaneous Benchmarks |
||||||
| Power Consumption | While idling and when running wPrime and GRID 2 | |||||
Notes
We're running the Gigabyte board with both the A10-6800K Richland chip and an A10-7850K Kaveri. Numbers provided by the older Richland APU offer a means by which the G1.Sniper can be compared against the ASRock FM2A88X-ITX+ (A88X) motherboard, while using the Kaveri APU shows the performance potential of the chipset. Intel's similarly-priced Core i3-4330 and Z87 combination lets you know if AMD APUs really are the best fit for inexpensive systems.
Overclocking
The Gigabyte is the second FM2+ board to pass through the labs. We spent a short while overclocking it by using the following parameters: CPU voltage 1.35V, GPU voltage 1.6V, DDR3 voltage 1.65V. Here is how the Gigabyte and ASRock compared:
Overclocking Comparison |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
Max CPU |
Max GPU |
Max Mem |
|
| Gigabyte G1.Sniper | 4,250 |
1,020 |
2,440 |
| ASRock A88X-ITX+ | 4,200 |
1,000 |
2,400 |