Multi-threaded performance
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2654/d2654f6957f312b6cc451f1415bb250aae425b04" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65652/65652b16d4d55294ef5e44edc758d53c9fadc3c6" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d815c/d815c173796a6698fd9a4a870a5948ce0c6f9582" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b290d/b290df8b6f4413f29db78143e0eac9e0b0be2625" alt=""
Summary
Again all five boards and chipsets show minimal variance, with all the multi-threaded performance tests coming within 2 per cent of each other.
The use of DDR2-1066 in the DivX encoding test actually saw a slight increase in the time taken to complete the test, further emphasising the fact that the 1066FSB is insufficient to take advantage of higher speed memories.