AMD insists performance not that important in server CPUs

by Scott Bicheno on 31 March 2009, 16:02

Tags: Intel (NASDAQ:INTC), AMD (NYSE:AMD)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qaroe

Add to My Vault: x

Taking on the juggernaut

Kreiten listed three areas in which he considers AMD to still have an advantage:

  • Memory management in virtualisation
  • Live migration in virtualisation
  • Energy efficiency

Regarding memory management, Kreiten explained that there is a performance penalty incurred by using virtualisation. "Now things are very memory intensive," he said. "RVI minimises the performance penalty for using virtualisation."

RVI stands for Rapid Virtualisation Indexing and is a piece of technology built into the hardware by AMD. Kreiten pointed us to an assessment of RVI written by VMWare - the market leader in virtualisation software.

Migration concerns the transfer of virtual machines from one piece of hardware to another. As demonstrated in our earlier story on this matter, AMD thinks it offers and advantage in this area. "Our migration path is much longer," said Kreiten. "You never have to reconfigure your virtual server."

The argument about energy efficiency has been in place since the original Shanghai launch.

It remains to be seen if potential purchasers will be convinced by these claimed advantages, but now that the Intel marketing juggernaut is well and truly rolling AMD will, as ever, have to shout very loudly to make itself heard.

What do you think? Does AMD have a point or is it just fighting a rearguard battle? Let us know in the HEXUS.community discussion forums.



HEXUS Forums :: 2 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Kreiten listed three areas in which he considers AMD to still have an advantage:

* Memory management in virtualisation
* Live migration in virtualisation
* Energy efficiency

Regarding memory management, Kreiten explained that there is a performance penalty incurred by using virtualisation. “Now things are very memory intensive,” he said. “RVI minimises the performance penalty for using virtualisation.”

The Xeon 5500's may suffer a larger relative performance penalty when Virtualised but they are still faster anyway so its complete tosh to suggest that AMD are better in this area.
Also, since the New Xeons are typically 1.5-2 times faster in performance where it matters on servers so you can now use less servers to do the same work or use servers with less Sockets which kind of throws the energy efficiency argument out of the window. That leads them with the live migration argument. That's the only one they have at all but that can be reduced by replacing all of your servers with Xeon 5500 based ones.

The only way Opteron servers can beat Nahalem servers is price.
The only reason to buy Opterons now is as an in place upgrade for the crappy Barcelona based ones.
I hope they do a 4800 series esque perfect storm on Intel in the next couple of years or they'll be relegated to cheapo low margin servers for a very long time.
as important and useful as i believe visualization is becoming, i would still tend to agree with with badass. I guess it depends what the server is being used for exactly.