Oracle launches 16-core CPU

by Pete Mason on 22 September 2010, 17:57

Tags: Sun Microsystems, Oracle (NASDAQ:ORCL)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qaz6f

Add to My Vault: x

Between courting controversy with HP, Oracle has been holding its annual technology conference this week, and took the opportunity to show off an all new SPARC CPU.

The 40nm 1.65GHz 16-core SPARC T3 processor supports a massive eight threads-per-core, enabling 128 simultaneous threads per CPU.  The chips also get 6MB L2 cahce, though the massive amount of parallelism may put the squeeze on the on-board memory.  Nonetheless, the company is promising double the throughput and I/O bandwidth compared to the previous generation of chips.

While the single-socket T3-1 server comes in a two server-rack unit (2U), the manufacturer is also shipping two-socket 3U and four-socket 5U versions.  The latter manages to combine four of the processors with up to 512GB of RAM for a 64-core, 512-thread monster.  Up to eight of these can be combined in a standard data centre rack, for a total of 4,096 simultaneous threads.

Unfortunately, the two key pieces of information - the cost and the power-usage - haven't been made available, so there's no way to tell exactly how practical these chips are.  At a time when performance per watt is becoming especially important in the server market, this data will be crucial to many potential customers.

Interestingly, this is the first processor from Oracle to be released under its own name.  The company purchased Sun in the first half of last year for somewhere around $7.4 billion and now appears to have chosen to use its own branding on the venerable SPARC line of processors.

Oracle is promising that the T3-based servers will be shipping to customers within the next 30 days.



HEXUS Forums :: 5 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
The latter manages to combine four of the processors with up to 512GB of RAM for a 128-core, 512-thread monster.

16 x 4 != 128 ;)

Although 16 x 4 x 8 == 512, so I assume it is just a typo :D
scaryjim
16 x 4 != 128 ;)

Although 16 x 4 x 8 == 512, so I assume it is just a typo :D

Each core is capable of 8 simultaneous threads so 4 processors x 16 cores x 8 threads = 512 threads!
Who cares about how many threads, its got 6Mb of L2 cahce for crying out loud!!!
RMcLeod
Each core is capable of 8 simultaneous threads so 4 processors x 16 cores x 8 threads = 512 threads!

Yes, hence my statement that 16 x 4 x 8 == 512. My point was that a 4 processor server would have 64 cores, not 128 as stated in the article :rolleyes:
RMcLeod
Each core is capable of 8 simultaneous threads so 4 processors x 16 cores x 8 threads = 512 threads!
Is that all - sheesh! :rolleyes:

IBM Power 795 = 8 processor books, each with 32 cores - so that's 256 cores. And with their simultaneous multi-threading that's up to 4 threads per core. So that's potentially 1,024 threads! Oh, and these puppies run at 4GHz rather than 1.65GHz that the T3's reach. :surprised:

Details are given in http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/redp4640.html?Open if you're interested.

Okay, the 795 probably costs as much as half a housing estate, and is a full rack to itself rather than slotting alongside other kit like the T3 kit will. On the other hand, the IBM gear IS pretty neat - the RAS and virtualization stuff especially - and it runs Linux too if you want (RHEL and SLES fully supported!). And best of all … you don't have to deal with Oracle. :puke:

Apologies for bigging up Big Blue, but I've got to give 'em credit where due. Even if they are the main competitor to my employer! :mad: