Review: Asus, Gigabyte, Sapphire and XFX Radeon RX 460 compared

by Tarinder Sandhu on 27 January 2017, 15:30

Tags: AMD (NYSE:AMD), ASUSTeK (TPE:2357), Gigabyte (TPE:2376), Sapphire, XFX (HKG:1079)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qaddmn

Add to My Vault: x

Vitals

Built on the latest processes from both companies, the GTX 1050 consumes the least amount of juice. Being even handed, 110W, the maximum reported figure under full load, barely tickles the capacity of any modern PSU.

A by-product of such relatively low consumption is good temperatures and quiet running. No card made anything approaching a racket during our testing. Indeed with official TDPs of 75W, one wouldn't expect anything different.

Overclocking

We increased each card's core and memory frequency without touching the voltage.

RX 460 Overclocking
 
Max Core Clock
Max MemClock
Asus Radeon RX 460 Strix OC
1,340
8,000
Gigabyte Radeon RX 460 OC 2GB
1,260
7,700
Gigabyte Radeon RX 460 OC 4GB
1,260
7,800
Sapphire Radeon RX 460 Nitro OC
1,330
8,000
XFX Radeon RX 460 Core DD
1,300
7,850

The numbers show that it is unlikely you will achieve much more than 1,300MHz on the core. Memory scales about 10 per cent higher than stock. Interestingly, the Asus card, in 1,024-core mode, overclocked to the same levels.