Review: Scan 3XS AMD Chameleon

by Ryszard Sommefeldt on 24 October 2005, 10:17

Tags: Athlon 64 X2 4800+ , SCAN, AMD (NYSE:AMD)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qaduw

Add to My Vault: x

Thoughts

With a specification like the Chameleon has, it's hard not to be impressed on a number of levels. Without sabotaging performance somehow it was always going to be a bit speedy, with the benchmarks bearing that out. It could be even quicker, that much is obvious, but it's no slouch in the tested configuration. While I hate the metric, 12500 3DMark05 points out of the box is very impressive. Everything else, from disk controller testing (110MB/sec sustained average read from the boot array, 92MB/sec sustained average read from the RAID3 storage array, which mirrors Steve's findings) to burning independant DVDs with no CPU hit on the Sony writers, made me wish in some way that the Chameleon was my own desktop workstation.

A couple of things did irk about the Chameleon and its tested configuration, though. The radiator cage stopping the use of all the display outputs without serious cable bending would irritate me no end, as a user of multiple monitors. And I'd be asking Scan to get rid of the fairly useless RAID0 boot array in favour of a fast and plentiful single disk (or indeed RAID1 of a larger volume to give me data protection and good performance over a larger volume, for the same money). Upgrading graphics on it would be a bugger, too (although with SLI overclocked GTXs, err....).

And while the Chameleon was undergoing testing, including using it for a day to see if it worked well as a serious workstation under my normal usage patterns, I was absolutely terrified of scratching the £960 paint job. Scan don't supply touch up paint for the Chameleon like they do with the Cobra, so serious care has to be taken to not slight the multi-layer paint application unless you want to send it back for repair work. That fear would diminish over time, but it was tangible and I hadn't even spent a penny to aquire it!

However, the Scan 3XS AMD Chameleon - as it stood in full-on, full-bore, balls on the table for all to see mode - seriously impressed, despite the flaws. As an exhibition about what can be built given enough money, I'd be tempted if I happened to have £5000 spare to invest in as fast and impressive a PC as money could buy.

The configuration would need some tweaking to fit my needs and taking on the paint job, no matter how impressive, would take serious consideration, but I'd have one. Mad performance and workstation ability from a great looking chassis. Obviously a completely boutique piece of hardware for the well-off only, at £5078 inc VAT in the tested state (without any productivity software, monitor, speakers, keyboard or mouse), but for those folks with the means it shows that Scan have the ability to join the likes of Alienware, SavRow and VoodooPC in building this kind of box for those kind of customers.

Absolutely cuckoo looney tunes, but very lovely with it.

HEXUS Awards

Scan 3XS AMD Chameleon

Scan 3XS AMD Chameleon



HEXUS Forums :: 21 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Does that mean all the CS:S Clan get one!!!!!?????? :) :)

What a beast… I am truely impressed!! I have the same motherboard actually… might be able to get some money together and make mine like that (someday:p ).
Rys can you just clarify if you found any problems with the a8n premium's chipset overheating? I have read some people have had problems with this motherboard in upsidedown cases like the tj06 (becuase of the heatpipe)? did you have any issues?
Its very good for a Vendor PC: But give me £5000 and I'll whoop its ass ;)
hi kempez815,

Deleted
Its very good for a Vendor PC: But give me £5000 and I'll whoop its ass ;)
perhaps, but could you offer a rock-solid guarantee, coupled with the highest level of timely customer care, to as many people as wanted the system?

or accommodate the trading risks of the distance selling regulations?

relatively large scale deployment of any, even mildly esoteric system, operating beyond the parameters set down by the individual component manufacturers, is entirely different from integrating the odd few that could be built by an individual or a small operation…

:)

cheers,

PD
Stability was fine during testing, including repeated load conditions, with no crashes or hangs. So I can't say I saw anything heat related due to the pipe being upside down. But then again I can see how it would be a problem.

I'll try and ask ASUS what they think.