System setup and notes
Benchmark Software
ScienceMark 2.0 (21st March 2005)HEXUS Pifast Benchmark
HEXUS.in-house MP3 Encoding benchmark using LAME 3.97a (Intel HT compiler) - 701MB WAV
HEXUS.in-house DivX encode using DivX 6.01 and VirtualDub on 416MB DV file
CINEBENCH 2003 multi-CPU render
KribiBench v1.1
HDTach 3.0.1.0
Splinter Cell: Chaos Theory v1.05 - HEXUS custom benchmark
Quake 4 v1.04 HEXUS Custom Benchmark
Far Cry v1.33 - HEXUS custom benchmark
Notes
Can you say fast? It's not running at 1.2V, either.
We had no stability problems at the overclocked speed. The system was unpacked from the box and worked first time. We ran a modified version of Prime95, that stresses dual-core systems, overnight. The Vadim Fusion Cetus was happily churning away FFTs after 10 hours, with CPU temperature at 52C and the motheboard's at 55C. We note that ambient temperatures hovered between 27-31C and fan speeds were set to 7V (default).
We're comparing the Vadim Fusion Cetus against a couple of high-end systems from MESH and Scan, respectively. Coinciding with the launch of Intel Core 2 Duo/Extreme processors a couple of weeks' ago, MESH delivered a Core 2 Extreme-powered PC that was based on an nForce4 chipset. In view of this, it was also equipped with 2 GeForce 7900 GTX SLI cards in SLI. Scan's effort, which showcased Athlon 64 FX-62 AM2 power, was another well-built system with attention to detail.
Overclocking
So how much further would it go? We managed to increase system speed up to 3.48GHz before instability set in. Vadim's obviously stringently tested this model and found 3.40GHz to be the sweetspot, and we agree.You've read over 2,000 words now, so let's break up the monotony and cut to some performance graphs.