What mobile phone buyers want

by Janani Krishnaswamy on 23 March 2011, 14:02

Tags: Strategy Analytics

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qa5ai

Add to My Vault: x

Analyze this

Ease of use, long battery life and a trusted manufacturer are the top three purchase priorities of phone buyers in both the US and Western Europe, suggests a recent report by Strategy Analytics Wireless Device Lab.

While strong coverage and a phone that fits well in the pocket are the other key criteria for US buyers, those in Western Europe often also tend to look for a phone that is lightweight.

Paul Brown, a director at the Strategy Analytics User Experience Practice, noted that "although larger screen devices provide a better multimedia experience, it is important that the boundaries of display size are not pushed too far, and that devices remain ‘pocketable', as well as remaining comfortable to use both one-handed and two-handed."

Studying purchase priorities from 2006 to 2010, Brown noted that interest in an eco-friendly phone has dropped considerably. "In 2010, 26% of respondents in Western Europe said they would be looking for an eco-friendly phone, down from 39% in 2008." While a long battery life has been the most important priority for respondents in Western Europe every year, he pointed out that "the weight of a phone has risen in importance, rising steadily since 2008."

Revealing specific insights into buyer priorities in the UK, Brown observed that "O2 respondents in the UK show above average interest in a lightweight phone, while Orange respondents exhibit above average interest in having a phone that is on the same network as friends or family, and having strong network coverage where they live.

"T-Mobile users place a greater importance in a phone that allows them to download applications and has an OS of their choice for their next device. Vodafone respondents in the UK show above average interest in getting the cheapest phone available for their next phone."

The report found that smartphone owners are the most demanding when it comes to purchasing a new device. Smartphone respondents are looking for new features that their current device does not have, and they want this to be provided by a trusted manufacturer.

Brown added: "The ability to personalize their device to their needs also has a high priority amongst smartphone owners, with the ability to download applications rated much higher than non-smartphone owners, allowing them to have expanded capabilities on their device."

The report assessed the importance of 18 high-level factors that consumers consider when purchasing a mobile phone. An online survey was conducted with phone owners in the US and Western Europe, and was then weighted based on age, carrier and device brand. 

 



HEXUS Forums :: 9 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
My priority is something that is cheap!
=assassin=;2060172
My priority is something that is cheap!

You must be a Vodafone customer :P
=assassin=;2060172
My priority is something that is cheap!

Thats soo true, contract prices and lengths are getting quite expensive now. For two adults in a household you are talking around £60 per month just for two modern phones on contract.

I have the HTC desire HD which is a brilliant phone in many ways but does fall short on the simply things from a phone, such as battery life and simplicity. For all of Androids cleverness , it is not simply to use. I many people at work who have recently got a android hand set and they all comment on how easy the old Nokia were compared to modern hand sets.
Personally my priority is not to be locked into a long contract.

I like smartphones, and would pay £2-300 up front, and the rest of the cost rolled into a 12 month airtime contract, but those contracts have basically disappeared. Instead they are all for a free phone and a lengthy tie in, which I don't want. In those 2 years the phone will become obsolete, and the network might become rubbish. (As Orange have over the past few years).

Instead over recent years, I have been buying SIM free smartphones, at a rather higher up-front cost than I would prefer, and then using a 30 day rolling contract. This does give me maximum flexibility, but the networks have effectively lost out, as they could have had me as a long term customer if they had offered the sort of contract I want.

Brewster0101
=assassin=;2060172
My priority is something that is cheap!
Thats soo true, contract prices and lengths are getting quite expensive now. For two adults in a household you are talking around £60 per month just for two modern phones on contract.

That's only because you chose to buy expensive high end smartphones. If the SIM free cost of the phone is similar to a mid range laptop, then it will be expensive however you pay for it. If you chose to lock yourself into a 2 year contract, then the instalments to pay for the phone will add up.

Complaining that the repayments on a fancy modern smartphone are too expensive, is like complaining that the repayments on a Mercedes limousine are too expensive when you could have brought a Volkswagen Golf.
The report is from “Strategy Analytics User Experience Practice” - no wonder Ease of Use is up there.

I would rather there is no phone locking by telecommunications companies so that it is an even playing field.