Hunt wants the UK to have fastest broadband in Europe by 2015

by Alistair Lowe on 21 August 2012, 10:15

Tags: BT

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qabk6f

Add to My Vault: x

Speaking in London yesterday afternoon, culture minister, Jeremy Hunt, claimed that the UK will have the "fastest broadband of any major European country by 2015." With the government releasing a further £300 million of funding.

This announcement came following previous accusations that Mr Hunt focused on speed more than coverage and to this, he pleaded guilty, claiming that we must recognise the increasing demand for high-speed content; in his speech, Mr Hunt mentioned the Olympic Games and cited some interesting usage figures:

 

  • 700GB/s were delivered from the BBC website when Bradley Wiggins won gold.
  • On a peak day, 2.8PB (petabytes - that's over 2.9 million gigabytes) were downloaded.
  • Nearly a million people watched Andy Murray win gold online, with nine million following coverage on their mobiles.
  • London2012.com received over 20 billion views.
Mr Hunt isn't wrong, short-sightedness could leave us in the stone age and it's great to see government initiative push us forwards, however, the minister also cites GDP studies to validate the government's expenditure on broadband. However this writer knows from experience and, perhaps many of our readers also, that even with government funding, broadband infrastructure firms, such as BT, are incredibly selective over how they interpret coverage requirements, often leaving industrial parks and new housing estates uncovered by high-speed fibre, as either the area in general already has sufficient coverage to meet targets or that the firm would make a loss by supporting a handful of widely-spread factories and offices, each requiring only a single connection.

If the government is to truly push forward with a successful GDP-boosting deployment of high-speed broadband, whilst having third-parties compete for business is a good driver, the government can't be completely hands-off in its handling of the matter.

On a very positive note, Mr Hunt has laid out his intent to support private firms in delivering fibre-to-the-home (FTTH) from 2016 onwards, which would see speeds surpass the one gigabit barrier sometime in the future.

 



HEXUS Forums :: 15 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
culture minister, Jeremy Hunt, claimed that the UK will have the “fastest broadband of any major European country by 2015.”
Oh how I laughed at that. “rofl” doesn't cover it… ;) That guy should get his own Saturday night show…
On a very positive note, Mr Hunt has laid out his intent to support private firms in delivering fibre-to-the-home (FTTH) from 2016 onwards, which would see speeds surpass the one gigabit barrier sometime in the future.
Good/great idea - just as long as it is firms and not just an excuse to go shovelling some more government money BT's way. Actually I'd like to see someone (or better still, more than one company) start seriously challenging BT and Virgin in this respect. Can't we persuade Google to start their network rollout to consumers over here sometime soon?
No thanks crossy, I don't want to be spied on more than I am already.
“Can't we persuade Google to start their network rollout to consumers over here sometime soon?”
What so they have complete and absolute control over the internet…no thanks.

Where I live the only options for broadband is ADSL over the telephone line, I have just been regraded from ADSLmax to ADSL2+ and now get 15Mb down and 0.9Mb up. Not sure when, if ever I will see FTTC here though.
Everyone capable of 2mb would be a start.

Not 95% of populace on 100mb, 5% can fork off.
I think most people would be happier just having decent availability of reasonable speed. Throwing some money at some private firms would be a good idea and I agree that doesn't mean throwing piles of cash to BT. If the government is serious about coverage then they'll have to stop pandering to BT and offer incentives to others.

There are options like WiMax to explore which would probably be quite suitable and cheap to implement in rural areas and smaller towns. I for one would love to have some alternative options. For most of us it is a case of having to rent phone lines for the internet because of ADSL or companies like NTL who push you into bundles or bump up the pricing if you refuse the telephone.

Frankly I don't see the need to compete for super high speeds for every household (and get your tin foil hats on, with our present and past government you have to wonder about motives lol). I'm stuck at 10meg which is plenty and I was happy enough with the 2meg beforehand (any big download hits traffic management anyway!)