Police to have powers to shut-down UK websites immediately

by Steven Williamson on 25 November 2011, 09:49

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qa77q

Add to My Vault: x

The UK police may soon be given the power to suspend and shut-down websites and domain names without the need of a court order, says domain name registry site, Nominet.

Nominet, who oversees “.uk” domain names, has said that it is “looking into a new expedited process to enable law enforcement bodies to suspend domain names if they are involved with serious crime.”

The news follows the suspension this week of over 2,000 “.uk” websites – presumably by obtaining a court order - by the Metropolitan Police E-Crime Unit for selling fake goods and non-existent products. The crime unit says that some of the sites sold fake branded products such as Nike and were used to illegally obtain customers bank details for other criminal purposes.

At the time of writing, the police force have not revealed the list of websites that have been suspended and have yet to issue advice to consumers who may have been affected.

With the process of obtaining a court order currently a lengthy affair, the police force will no doubt welcome power to shut down sites quickly. However, the new measure will only grant immediate intervention if the site poses “serious consumer harm,” examples include the sale of unlicensed medicines, fraud and phishing.

More information on the new measures can be found here: http://www.nominet.org.uk/digitalAssets/51980_Draft_Issue_Group_Recommendations_on_Domain_Names__Criminal_Activity.pdf .


HEXUS Forums :: 12 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
There come Orwells future.
Problem is, once the mechanisms for this exists for “serious crime”, it's easier to claim it should be done for “less serious” things, to the point where a website can be shutdown just because some company with a lot of money takes a disliking towards it.

Unless the mechanism comes with very clear strings attached as to what it can be used for and what it could EVER be used for (or could never be used for), I don't want it.
Well I certainly appreciate the limitation of “serious consumer harm”, which in my opinion is a fairly rigid term provided the police don't start deciding what is best for consumers.

Reminds me of I, Robot. Just like the supercomputer in the film, the police will evolve to interpret the meaning of the three laws of policeics and subdue the public to prevent them from harming themselves.
Agree with Steve, it's another one of those laws that could easily be exploited by vested interests. I can imagine “unlicensed medicine” to include natural remedies(eg: honey,ginger and lemon for post nasal drip) because they reduce the amount of drug sales for pharmaceutical companies. It's extreme but a similar vague law in America is being used in exactly that way.

I'd rather do without the “benefits” of the law just to be sure the negatives never come into existence.
Scribe
Well I certainly appreciate the limitation of “serious consumer harm”, which in my opinion is a fairly rigid term provided the police don't start deciding what is best for consumers.
Well, an entertainment lobbyist could easily put a case together to argue that increased MP3 download prices due to piracy causes “serious consumer harm”, effectively turning the tables of power to say “if you don't do as we say, we will harm consumers”.