Nokia Symbian event falls flat

by Sylvie Barak on 29 October 2009, 11:41

Tags: Nokia (NYSE:NOK)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qaunu

Add to My Vault: x

From recession to depression

The challenge now, said Wigforss, "is maintaining market share with new competitors entering the space, but we're still the biggest."

As for allegations that Symbian wasn't straightforward enough for developers, who preferred to programme for iPhone, Wigforss maintained that "complication of coding on Symbian depends on what you want to do." He also added that Symbian was "ahead of the game on Flash."

Other Symbian evangelists have also stressed the OS's "heritage of mobile" and low power footprint, which makes for some pretty impressive battery life. But whether that's enough to keep Nokia at the top spot of market leader for much longer seems a bit doubtful.

Could the prominent and enthusiastic massage service have been provided in anticipation of Symbian-related stress?



Judging by the event itself, even Nokia seems to have resigned itself to its fate as just another OS in what is rapidly becoming an overcrowded market. The Symbian event lacked not only buzz and enthusiasm, but also any sort of real optimism about the future.



You could even say it was an event which would have suited Marvin the Paranoid Android. "I'm not getting you down at all, am I?"



HEXUS Forums :: 10 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
The sooner Symbian dies, the better. Calling it a “smartphone OS” is a farce
Hardly surprising that nobody's interested any more, it's looking incredibly dated and clunky now compared to the likes of Android, the iPhone and Nokia's own Maemo. Why would most people really want to choose the Windows 95 of smartphone OSs when there are far smoother platforms out there?
I have a symbian phone and to be honest, calling it the “Windows 95 of smartphone OSs” is highly flattering :P

I hate it and if it wasn't a works phone, it would have found it's way to the bottom of a bin a long time ago.
As per usual, a total lack of development means you fall behind.

However symbian is still light years ahead of windows mobile, which is the punched card of smartphone OSs.
My N97 is the last Nokia/Symbian choice for me. I already have issues with Nokia and them messing up their devices, not releasing firmware updates for the UK off line handsets (which mine is). They seem to release new handsets every 2 days instead of sorting out the issues with their current models. It takes about 6 months before a device is stable.

Symbian is old and clunky. It is very slow and sluggish. Sure its ahead on some things like flash capability, but others like the email client on the N97 is appalling, no native HTML reader, unless you install Nokias Messaging client which is so cumbersome and rubbish to use. BTW I DO have v20 installed, it is running better, but it should have been like this from the beginning. Or roll out updates frequently.

I would be tempted by the N900, but its done an Apple. No MMS.