Intel Penryn (45nm) dual- and quad-core benchmarks - Conroe and Kentsfield flayed and sent packing

by Tarinder Sandhu on 18 April 2007, 12:57

Tags: Penryn, Intel (NASDAQ:INTC)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qaihv

Add to My Vault: x

Conclusion







The multi-threaded 3DMark06 shows an improvement with Penryn, as well. The increase, other than FSB and clock, is influenced by the CPU's cache levels.



Half-Life 2 has always been a system-bound test when using a decent graphics card. Penryn's collection of additional technologies boosts performance again, mainly via the floating-point enhancements. This metric isn't, perhaps, the most illuminating. Who plays at 1024x768 with a GeForce 8800GTX

Thoughts

The thoughts to take away from this brief look at Penryn performance is that it's more than just a process shrink. The collection of additional tech, ranging from Super Shuffle to Radix-16, offer real performance gains in the right environment.

We appreciate that Intel has engineered this benchmarking session to fully exploit the new Core microarchitecture's advancements, thus providing a best-case scenario, but we feel that Penryn - be it in Wolfdale (dual-core) or Yorkfield (quad-core) guise - is a worthwhile advancement on an already-decent processor, especially as Intel has kept the same form factor and thermal envelope intact.

The real question is, we suppose, how well will AMD's Barcelona perform in comparison. We now know Penryn's potential, but AMD keeps us guessing.


HEXUS Forums :: 14 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Any news on prices? I want but i dont want my bank manager trying this “ass mastering” out :P
Interesting times ahead, with the price wars hotting up, lets hope AMD bring something good to the table as well :)
Performance looks like a nice improvement, but the main concern for me is what did they change on the motherboard.

The 975x doesn't officially support 1333FSB, so if it was just a small tweak to help ensure stability during the demonstration then thats not a problem, I'm running 1333FSB right now on my board as are many others and the 975x has never been great at that kind of bus speed.

If its an electrical specification change though then this is more serious, this was changed with Conroe and is thought to be why everyones boards had to be revised to support it.
If a year later they are breaking support again then thats just taking the piss in my opinion.
Whoa freakin awesome, I may hold out on my laptop till the last minute if they manage to release some of this technology to mobile CPU's after summer ends ;o
I think we all need to hope that Barcelona is superb, just to maintain the pace of these performance improvements (and even price cuts!) that the two firms are forcing from each other.