Gigabyte preparing Mini-ITX Fusion motherboard

by Pete Mason on 8 December 2010, 14:31

Tags: Gigabyte (TPE:2376), AMD (NYSE:AMD)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qa3h4

Add to My Vault: x

Most of the news surrounding AMD's Fusion platform has focused on the upcoming mobile chips, but the Bobcat-based Zacate APUs will also be finding a home in low-power desktops and nettops. Apparently Gigabyte will be one of the first companies to launch one of these products, and X-bit Labs has managed to get its hands on some details of the company's upcoming Mini-ITX board.

Despite its size, the GA-E350V-USB3 actually has quite a rich feature set. At the heart of the board is the Zacate E350 APU, which combines a 1.6GHz dual-core processor with a Radeon HD 6310 GPU that packs 80 stream processors running at 500MHz. There's also room for a pair of DDR3 DIMMs and a full-size PCIe x16 slot - although it isn't clear if it's limited to x8 speeds, as with some other boards in this form-factor.

According to the source, it will also support four SATA 3Gbps hard-drives, USB 3.0, VGA and DVI outputs and multi-channel audio. Unfortunately, the chipset lacks a few key features, including gigabit Ethernet and RAID support, meaning that this probably isn't the best fit for a NAS or home server.

Obviously the 18W APU isn't going to be a performance monster, but Gigabyte is including plenty of higher-end features to help owners to get the most out of the system. As well as the presumed ability to overclock the APU, the board supports memory at up to 1,800MHz, high quality capacitors to help keep the board stable and plenty of copper as a part of the Ultra Durable 3 design.

Again, this chip won't exactly blow the doors off, but it could form the basis of pretty capable low-power desktop or HTPC. Gigabyte also seems to have outfitted the board with plenty of features, making it a pretty attractive option for anyone looking to build a Fusion-based system. Unfortunately, there are no details on pricing or availability, but we're sure that there'll be more after AMD launches its processors in the new year.



HEXUS Forums :: 15 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Not particularly inspiring…. Can't see the benefit of this over the S775 Zotac boards, or the Atom ones.

Seems to be just an AMD version of the Intel ITX boards that are out presently. Certainly no reason that I can see over an intel one…
Tattysnuc
Not particularly inspiring…. Can't see the benefit of this over the S775 Zotac boards, or the Atom ones.

Seems to be just an AMD version of the Intel ITX boards that are out presently. Certainly no reason that I can see over an intel one…

Quite a few reasons TBH:
1.)Lower power consumption.
2.)Better performing IGP when compared to the standard Intel IGPs in the Atom and CULV motherboards. Much better media decoding support.
3.)In terms of die space is much smaller than the CULV solutions and hence will probably be cheaper.
4.)The E350 is faster than a dual core Atom in most applications.
5.)4 SATA ports.
HTPC winner there I think
Tattysnuc
Not particularly inspiring…. Can't see the benefit of this over the S775 Zotac boards, or the Atom ones.

Seems to be just an AMD version of the Intel ITX boards that are out presently. Certainly no reason that I can see over an intel one…

Except there isn't really an Intel equivalent is there? I can buy an Atom board with a separate GPU on board but where's my combined CPU/GPU? In a related thread - what's the power draw like? Fusion is interesting from both performance and power POV so it'd be nice to consider that before jumping to conclusions. S775 isn't in this league, it's big power by comparison so that leaves Atom which when combined with something like Ion (as near as we get to APU from intel) that's got to be considerably more power draw..
Tattysnuc
Not particularly inspiring…. Can't see the benefit of this over the S775 Zotac boards, or the Atom ones.

Seems to be just an AMD version of the Intel ITX boards that are out presently. Certainly no reason that I can see over an intel one…

Faster CPU than Atom, but not by that much, better graphics than Intel solutions, probably equivalent-ish to ION, but maybe a bit better, good enough for basic media centre. Power draw probably not much more than basic Atom, and less or same as an ION board.

A Core 2 CULV board from the likes of Zotac is probably a better comparison, and roughly equivalent CPU, but far worse graphics unless with ION…

On balance I'd rather have a Core i3/i5 ULV ITX board… but not sure if any exist yet?