Review: Asus ROG Strix X470-I Gaming

by Tarinder Sandhu on 17 May 2018, 14:01

Tags: ASUSTeK (TPE:2357), Intel (NASDAQ:INTC)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qadtm7

Add to My Vault: x

Conclusion

The Asus ROG Strix X470-I Gaming, priced at £175, takes a mid-spec route with a few nice touches...

The AMD X470 chipset is now widely available enough for us to look at a bunch of boards and separate the wheat from the chaff. Most are solid, because the chipset provides plenty of goodness, and the emergence of second-generation Ryzens help performance move up a notch or two.

Looking to appeal to those building a small PC with AMD's latest and greatest chips, the Asus ROG Strix X470-I Gaming, priced at £175, takes a mid-spec route with a few nice touches. These include a multi-layer audio and M.2 heatshield combo that works well, a second M.2 if you are willing to sacrifice graphics bandwidth, and RGB lighting that is as good as any out there. The BIOS, also, remains excellent.

There are still a few potential stumbling blocks to be aware of. Access to a couple of the SATA ports is limited (though would you really use all four?), and the WiFi isn't the best.

£175 isn't cheap for an AM4 motherboard, of course, but Asus probably just does enough to make it on to a prospective shortlist if going small is key to your PC aims.

The Good
 
The Bad
Looks good
Explicit M.2 cooling
Has watercooling header
RGB done well
 
Awkward SATA
No USB Type-C
RGB control ought to be in BIOS



Asus ROG Strix X470-I Gaming

HEXUS.where2buy*

The Asus ROG Strix X470-I Gaming motherboard is available to purchase from Scan Computers.

HEXUS.right2reply

At HEXUS, we invite the companies whose products we test to comment on our articles. If any company representatives for the products reviewed choose to respond, we'll publish their commentary here verbatim.



*UK-based HEXUS community members are eligible for free delivery and priority customer service through the SCAN.care@HEXUS forum.



HEXUS Forums :: 6 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
I think I can live without SATA now. In fact I think most users could, especially since there are two M.2.

USB-C on a desktop.. not sure I've got one at the moment but don't use it.

a second M.2 if you are willing to sacrifice graphics bandwidth
Any testing been done on what the impact is? I seem to recall that no GPUs come close to maxing out the PCI-E bandwidth.

Nice board by the look of it, good thing as it seems to be the only game in town for x470 mini-ITX as far as I can tell.
Running SATA on the m.2 ports doesn't trouble the GPU bandwidth, right? Because that's the way I'd go if I needed two SSDs on this board, identical performance to nvme and a whole lot cheaper
Fizzl
I think I can live without SATA now. In fact I think most users could, especially since there are two M.2.

USB-C on a desktop.. not sure I've got one at the moment but don't use it.

a second M.2 if you are willing to sacrifice graphics bandwidth
Any testing been done on what the impact is? I seem to recall that no GPUs come close to maxing out the PCI-E bandwidth.

Nice board by the look of it, good thing as it seems to be the only game in town for x470 mini-ITX as far as I can tell.

Well there is the ASRock Fatal1ty X470 Gaming-ITX/ac, but otherwise, no there isn't much in the X470 mini itx market.
Xlucine
Running SATA on the m.2 ports doesn't trouble the GPU bandwidth, right? Because that's the way I'd go if I needed two SSDs on this board, identical performance to nvme and a whole lot cheaper

Nope, it just switches off one of the physical SATA ports. That said, you would be ‘limited’ to 550MB/s or so.
Great motherboard, but slightly overkill for me. I wish ASRock would hurry up and release their X470 Gaming-ITX/ac in the UK. Really keen to replace my Intel Haswell NUC as an HTPC.