ASUS F1A75-V PRO AMD Llano motherboard review

by Tarinder Sandhu on 29 July 2011, 09:18 4.0

Tags: ASUSTeK (TPE:2357)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qa6rw

Add to My Vault: x

Final thoughts and rating

AMD provides a heck of a lot of integration with its A-series APU processors, as it couples CPU cores, a memory-controller, and graphics on to one chip. Going further, AMD provides a controller chip with built-in USB 3.0 and SATA 6Gbps high-speed connectivity.

One can make a case for any A-series motherboard to be simple in design; AMD has done most of the hard work. ASUS, however, believes there's a market for premium APU-based motherboards, and the F1A75-V PRO is a case in point.

Presented in a full-ATX form factor and improved by the inclusion of additional USB 3.0 SATA/eSATA support, along with a quality UEFI BIOS and an array of video outputs, this is an AMD A6/A8 platform with almost all the bells and whistles tacked on.

Being critical, we'd like to see FireWire specified as standard, and understanding the premium nature of the board, being able to independently overclock the GPU core would be preferable.

Here's the skinny, folks. A £65 microATX-sized FM1 board will do for most readers - you'll have USB 3.0 and SATA 6Gbps as standard. The reviewed ASUS F1A75-V PRO costs £20 more, and whether it's worth it will depend on how keen you are to have ASUS-added features.

Solid, feature-rich and well-laid-out, we reckon the F1A75-V PRO will make a good home to a premium-quality PC based around AMD's A6/A8 APU technology.

The Good

Quality BIOS
Well-laid-out
Chock-full of USB 3.0 and (e)SATA

The Bad

No FireWire support
No explicit GPU overclocking

HEXUS Rating


ASUS F1A75-V PRO motherboard

HEXUS Awards


ASUS F1A75-V PRO motherboard

HEXUS Where2Buy

TBC.

HEXUS Right2Reply

At HEXUS, we invite the companies whose products we test to comment on our articles. If any company representatives for the products reviewed choose to respond, we'll publish their commentary here verbatim.

 




HEXUS Forums :: 8 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
In all honesty who cares about firewire?? I ouwl suspect most normal users wont have a clue what its about or its intended use. I have used firwire one to setup a firewire network to see how good it was and then just went back to ethernet.

Otherwise nice board and good review :)
Yeah, firewire seems to be less used now then a few years ago and it wasn't used much then.

Looks a tidy board, might even make a nice budget “bling pc” with a windowed case and some lighting on that heatsink ;)
Can honestly say I have never used a Firewire port. I like cases without them on the front panel, it just offends me having it there un-used!

Never used eSATA for that matter either, USB2.0 and now 3.0 has always been fine for my needs, I never seem to move large volumes of data on/off machines to external storage, it's always across networks - I've been running Gigabit at home for as long as I can remember, since it became affordable pretty much. I'd rather see better quality ethernet chips on boards than extra USB3.0 chips (2 ports for storage is fine, a keyboard/mouse is NEVER going to need that bandwidth!) or Firewire, one of the main reasons I went for the Asus P8Z68 is the Intel NIC, much better than Realtek or Marvell.
dfour
In all honesty who cares about firewire?? I ouwl suspect most normal users wont have a clue what its about or its intended use.

I suspect most normal users won't be buying a premium board though. They'd be using a more budget-orientated board, unless they've more money than sense.

While I don't use firewire often (I only use it for transferring video from an HD video camera to a PC for editing) I think it's unforgivable not to have it on an £85 top-end board, or at the very least having a header on the board.
this_is_gav
While I don't use firewire often (I only use it for transferring video from an HD video camera to a PC for editing) I think it's unforgivable not to have it on an £85 top-end board, or at the very least having a header on the board.

Ok but wouldnt it also increase the board cost as I dont believe the chipset/liano has native firewire support so you would have to include a firewire chip, internal wiring to a header etc all more cost on a already (for liano) expensive board ??