Flexible aluminium battery promises safety, faster charging

by Mark Tyson on 7 April 2015, 16:35

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qacqjo

Add to My Vault: x

Scientists at Stanford University have developed an Aluminium-ion based battery which offers many practical advantages over the popular Lithium-ion cells that are common in our gadgets. The aluminium based batteries are cheaper to make, charge much faster and are safer for users and the environment. The only real drawback with the aluminium designs is that, at this time, they can only deliver about half the voltage of a comparable lithium battery.

Lithium-ion batteries power most of our expensive gadgets and are now more likely than ever to be an important part of many new cars you see on the road. However scientists are beginning to hit barriers in how far they can optimise these Lithium-ion battery cell designs and they often are in the news due to the danger they can cause.

One of the most striking things about the new Aluminium-ion battery is how much safer it seems to be. "Our new battery won't catch fire, even if you drill through it," claims Hongjie Dai, a professor of chemistry at Stanford. Add to this the very flexible nature of the current cell design and it's easy to see the appeal. The ingredients of the battery are a piece of aluminium for the negative anode and a carbon cathode. The electrolyte is "basically a salt that's liquid at room temperature, so it's very safe, said Stanford graduate student Ming Gong, co-lead author of the Nature study. All of these 'ingredients' are held in a flexible polymer coated pouch, as seen below.

The Aluminium-ion battery prototype also boasts the following impressive advantages:

  • "Unprecedented charging times" of under a minute
  • Able to withstand over 7,500 cycles without any loss of capacity
  • Flexibility
  • Cheaper, made with abundant, widely available materials

While this battery design has gone leaps and bounds above previous aluminium-based efforts before it, there is one disadvantage right now compared to Lithium batteries – the prototype produced just 2 volts - yet a similar sized Li-ion one could have output 3.6V. The power density on offer is just 40W/Kg, Lithium cells can boast between 100 and 200W/Kg. Prof. Dai says that "improving the cathode material could eventually increase the voltage and energy density". He added that the charging speed, price, flexibility and cycle life makes these Aluminium cells exciting for things such as a grid to store renewable energy.



HEXUS Forums :: 12 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Well the voltage doesn't really matter, just connect two in series, as is done with Lithium polymer batteries. However the energy density may be more serious issue. But then if it can accept high charge rates, that may mitigate it to some extent. But isn't just energy density, physical size is also important.
Well, cheapness might be useful here. Enough of these in series could make a cheap way to add a battery to PCs in case of dodgy power supply - even if it only lasted ten minutes. Home energy storage systems (capturing solar energy from the roof to power the house at night) could be made cheaply, even if the unit was large (as things like this can be hidden in many places in a house). And you wouldn't need to worry about it going really burny either. And 7500 charges is a good 20 years lifespan (charge during day, drain during night). The fast charge isn't so useful here apart from allowing you to top up quickly from the grid if necessary.
This sounds like a good development - as to the density issue, presumably this is “Al/C cell mark 1” so - as the article says - there's plenty of scope for the usual development/refinement.

I'm guessing that in addition to being more damage resistant, the new batteries are also not going to burst into flames, like LiPo are supposed to.
crossy
I'm guessing that in addition to being more damage resistant, the new batteries are also not going to burst into flames, like LiPo are supposed to.

Some cells are easier to set off than others, but overall if it can't burst into flames, then it isn't storing energy :)