daytripstoeurope.co.uk - the genesis of a web site

by Bob Crabtree on 19 April 2007, 11:24

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qaiif

Add to My Vault: x

Just a little small-change, perhaps?


The week that I decided to unveil my creation, the media was full of stories about how we must all stop travelling abroad, or anywhere, because of global warming!

Clearly this was not the ideal time to be launching a site extolling the virtues of travelling to Europe for the day.

Air travel came in for most public criticism, with report after report suggesting that aviation was the biggest single threat to civilisation since the invention of the atomic bomb.

Was it just me or did anyone else spot the irony of journalists flying all over the world to report on how flying all over the world was causing global warming?

At this point I contemplated shelving the project. But after carrying out some research, I felt much less guilty. I discovered that the UK contributes less than two per cent of all global carbon emissions and air travel less than five per cent.

Industry, domestic heating and power and motor transport all individually account for far higher percentages than aviation.

But it wasn't until I found out about carbon offsetting that I felt I could launch the site with a clear conscience. Offsetting companies work out how much CO2 a journey creates, levy a charge against the traveller – around £3 to £5 for a flight to Europe – and put the money into different projects around the world that neutralize the carbon footprint of that journey.

Eco-friendly
Get your health card and be carbon-neutral   

Although the media was again full of global-warming stories, I did finally launch daytripstoeurope in October 2006 - complete with carbon-offsetting links and four city guides (there are seven today, with more on the way).

And I even sent out my press release because I no longer felt like I was promoting germ-warfare kits. I needn't have worried though - more or less all the press ignored my release and the site.

However, one or two journalists, no doubt by complete coincidence, very soon after came up with the clever idea of writing articles about day-tripping to Europe!

In the absence of any publicity, search engines suddenly became critically important, as they were now the only way that anyone could find the site.

A lot has been written about how to get a site onto that crucial first page of search results, and the impact of meta-tagging, key-words on the page (and how early they appear) and key-word repetition – and the varying importance that different engines attach to them.

Some liken the process to a science, others think it's more like a black art. What I find works best is a little bit of everything – key-words as meta-tags and located high up in the text of a page, along with a little bit of repetition.

But more important than where you put the key-words are the words themselves. Spend time thinking about all the words and phrases that people might use to find your site - including common spelling errors.

Experiment with your key-words in different search engines and see what each throws up. Doing that will almost certainly highlight some words that you haven't thought of and illustrate the importance of the first three or four search-words.

Then use a web-statistics gatherer such as statcounter.com. This will not only help refine your key words by telling you which have been used to find your site but also give you lots of other useful information, such as what countries your visitors are coming from, what browsers they're using and how long they were on the site.

StatCounter
Click for larger image

Statcounter is free and you can put a counter (visible or invisible) on any page you want to collect statistics. At the moment, I have just one - on my home page - but as visitor numbers go up, I may want to put counters on other pages.

When Nietzsche said "that which does not kill us, makes us stronger", he'd obviously never built a web site. If he had, he probably would have written, "that which does not kill us, can occasionally induce paranoia leading to a persistent vegetative state".

So why am I still doing it? Well, I do believe it was an original idea for a travel site – and I know that I would have made regular use of such a site if I'd ever been able to find one.

Then there's the simple truth that I enjoy travelling. Checking out amazing cities for the site has been no kind of chore at all.

And, although I'd like to pretend it's all about the art and the travel, it would be nice to think that the site might be able to make me some money one day.

Finally, I've always wanted somewhere to stick my travel photographs – other than a shoebox – and my own site lets me share them.

It's not been an easy ride but it's one that I've enjoyed (mostly) and has been worthwhile going on/

Check out John's little baby, then tell us in the HEXUS.community about your own experiences creating web sites.

HEXUS.links

HEXUS.community :: discussion thread about this article

External.links

daytripstoeurope.co.uk - home page
Namo - home page
Rick Maybury - BootLog
statcounter.com - home page


HEXUS Forums :: 14 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Unlike the parent in this thread, I created a site entirely devoid of content - www . bobpitch . com
BP, as I affectionately shall refer to it, is a homage to the popular waste of time site Popbitch. The initial idea was that I wished to replicate the look and feel of PB, with a slightly more relaxed editorial policy - I just wanted people to turn up and ramble away to each other about whatever they felt like - build it and they will come etc.
Initial version was on PL/SQL on Oracle running on my ADSL - not an especially popular configuration and I rapidly learnt why.
First proper version was PHP/MySQL/Apache and it's stayed on that to this day, with the server beneath it growing from an initial Linux share, to a proper dedicated dual-core monster that it's run on today.
Design has quietly progressed from the initial ‘messages’ on a single page to do some more interesting things. None of these features are really required, but they were ideas I wanted to see happen and once you've got the framework built, it's not too hard to add on the extra stuff.
There's an email server with a couple of webmail front ends. Ability to MMS pictures from your phone in and receive replies as SMS. Google Maps integration showing you who's where and what they're saying. Internal messaging. Email integration.
Anway, enough of that.
It's been running for a few years and my only input's been a hundred k or so of code. Out of that, I've made a little comunity that's so far racked up 4.6 Million posts - which is really quite a lot whenever I think about it.
All been stable for a while now and I'm now not quite sure what to do with it. My intention is to stop hacking it and go back through the code to produce something re-usable. Easiest option is to just Open-Source it and give it away - but that isn't going to make me rich. I suspect selling it wouldn't make me rich either though and would just be a pain in the arse.
Anyhow, if you're at a loose end and want to see how to build a completely pointless, yet somehow surviving site - Bobpitch . com
Just in case anyone is worried - goldcd's site - http://www.bobpitch.com - does seem to me to be pretty much what he says.

Bob C
Just what we need, more websites with broken markup, no alt tags, pages of text 100's of lines long, and main links that conspicuously disappear. Oh well, at least there's no AJAX…
What the hell? Just looked at the source for daytripstoeurope.. that code could do with a bit of tidying up, there are like 50 carriage returns between each code block..

But.. My pennethworth about website design.

1. If you want to learn how to code web pages, then NEVER touch software designed for it, a notepad like editor will suffice - that way you'll learn faster, learn how to debug (especially if you're using PHP/AJAX) and you can optimise your code.

2. Make sure you validate your site using the W3C validator. This will ensure that everyone else can see your site properly (of course almost every CSS user despises IE with a vengeance, but that can't be helped..). Things like “alt” tags on pictures and making sure that your tag order is correct (not so much of an issue now, but it still happens).

3. CSS and XHTML are amazing :) it's well worth learning about how to make websites without the <table> tag and using <div> and <span> instead. CSS also makes it a lot easier to do a complete revamp of a website's design scheme (fonts, colours, etc.)

4. It's worth having some sort way of organising code, like using tabs, makes it a LOT easier to work out which closing tags belong to which.

5. This is more of a personal opinion, but try not to go heavy on the pictures - especially animated gif's - we've all seen Scan.co.uk in it's former glory :P If you have to have a photoshopped uber amazing template then fine, but bear in mind that some people have slower connections and an image heavy website is no fun if you have to wait for 5 minutes for it to load.

Hope this helps :)
Here's my “WIP” site: www.struckbylightning.co.uk
The daytripstoeurope.co.uk website really could do with a redesign, not least in the way it scales.

It appears as a extremely narrow column (640x480?) of centered text on my WS monitor.

Couldn't the web designer have scaled the site better? It would be worth him getting some input from some more web savvy users.