Samsung looking to define post-DDR4 memory

by Mark Tyson on 7 September 2015, 12:06

Tags: Samsung (005935.KS)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qacuhd

Add to My Vault: x

At the IDF2015 last month Samsung revealed some slides which sketched out a preliminary timescale for the development and deployment of post-DDR4 memory. The South Korean electronics giant indicated that prototypes for the next generation memory would probably emerge in 2018 with adoption in components and devices starting in 2020.

Data rates of the next-gen RAM will rise to as much as 6.4Gbps per pin, enabling modules to be constructed offering over 50GB/s of bandwidth – that's double what is possible with DDR4. Production memory module capacity will range from 8GB to 32GB. In slides published by ComputerBase you can see that Samsung expects post-DDR4 memory to be produced on sub-10nm processes. You can see that in the near term future Samsung is considering using 2.5D or 3D architecture for the upcoming memory standard.

As you can see from Samsung's footnotes about the development, the possibilities are pretty open right now with various technologies under consideration for critical performance aspects of the post-DDR4 memory.

Looking at adoption, Samsung expects that post-DDR4 will be deployed in servers first with desktops and laptops following closely before 2020 is out. It is less clear when mobile devices will catch up and, as for graphics, the transition from GDDR5 to HBM2 is expected to become mainstream between 2017/2018.



HEXUS Forums :: 6 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
I was under the impression that HBM was the answer to inefficient RAM, what did I miss!
J3FFW1SH
I was under the impression that HBM was the answer to inefficient RAM, what did I miss!
HBM does you no good without the interposer. And because the interposer needs to be fabbed on a semiconductor process (rather than a PCB) that gives hard limits on physical size, and thus maximum capacity. HBM also gives a very wide IO, but not a particularly high clock rate (which is how it achieves power saving). Great for moving big chunks of data in and out of on-die cache, but not so good for low-latency access to small bits of data.
J3FFW1SH
I was under the impression that HBM was the answer to inefficient RAM, what did I miss!
HBM is video memory, which requires a very high bandwidth to move large chunks of data. CPU RAM requires low latency for smaller chunks of data more often.
Well will you just look at that shrinking desktop market :(
kalniel
Well will you just look at that shrinking desktop market :(

Most people want laptops, even if a desktop is what they need.

Phones get replaced very fast still, probably 2 years if you don't drop it. With the number that get broken, the average replacement is probably well under 2 years still. I think that inflates the mobile market quite heavily.

I suspect that is about to change though. New phones are getting pretty good even at the low end and people around me seem to be increasingly on SIM only contracts and can replace their phone on whim or need. As the technology settles down I can see 3 years being the new norm for phone replacement before long.