Seagate's HDD multi actuator performance breakthrough

by Mark Tyson on 19 December 2017, 12:01

Tags: Seagate (NASDAQ:STX)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qadozk

Add to My Vault: x

Please log in to view Printer Friendly Layout

Seagate has announced “a new performance breakthrough” which stems from the use of multi actuator technology. The name of the technology provides a good clue to how it works; in the near future Seagate will equip hard drives with dual actuators, with each actuator controlling half of the drive’s arms reading/writing data to the platters. Working independently of each other, the arms can potentially double performance while maintaining the same capacity.

“We’re leveraging our long-time leadership in engineering all elements of hard drive technology to provide a solution with breakthrough performance, within industry standards,” said James Borden, principal product strategist at Seagate. “Our Multi Actuator solution is based on proven technology and adheres to current standards, so it’ll plug-and-play into today’s infrastructure.”

In other words Seagate’s new multi actuation technology is a way to put the performance of parallelism within a single hard drive unit. Effectively the computer treats the drive as if it is two separate drives, acting upon two different data requests at the same time. Borden summed up the tech attraction as “Basically, we’re taking the high-capacity hard drive a customer already needs and expects, and magically doubling the IOPS the customer gets from it — with no down side”. This is an important initiative to begin now, as Seagate admits that super-high capacity HDDs, with higher areal densities, put downwards pressure on performance.

Seagate’s new multi actuator drives will provide an attractive cost per TB while achieving an optimal IOPS/TB at the price. Shipping multi actuator equipped storage will be released “in the near future,” says Seagate.



HEXUS Forums :: 15 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Always wondered why they didn't work like this, seemed a logical way of upping transfer speeds when you have multiple heads and platters…
So you're going to lose data twice as fast now…? ;)
shaithis
Always wondered why they didn't work like this, seemed a logical way of upping transfer speeds when you have multiple heads and platters…

I think this is more for increasing IOPS with multiple concurrent jobs than increasing overall transfer speeds.

Maybe it'll better mitigate the massive reduction in transfer speeds when introducing random IOPS.
Hmmm… not sure I like this idea, two drives for ‘backup’ etc is fine because you have redundancy but putting 2 things inside one case can double the things that can fail which ultimately increases the chances of an item failing. This is basically reads as if it's going to be striped raid inside one box so if one fails you lose the whole lot…

I'm also not sure that at this is going to be fast enough to counter a pcie ssd let alone a ram drive if someone really wants fast IOPS
SSD pricing is ridiculous. Good time to introduce this tech to the HDD.