Review: AMD A10-7860K

by Tarinder Sandhu on 14 April 2016, 16:31

Tags: AMD (NYSE:AMD), Intel (NASDAQ:INTC)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qacz4z

Add to My Vault: x

Conclusion

AMD has wrung all it can out of the existing Kaveri APU architecture, streamlined to 65W TDP in this case, so the A10-7860K remains a competent processor for the mainstream PC market.

It's long been understood that you needn't spend a small fortune on a new PC to gain adequate performance in today's applications and games. This point is reinforced if we look at what are considered budget CPUs and mainstream graphics cards.

Available at retail at below the £100 mark are competent processors from AMD and Intel. The latest of the APU line is characterised by the A10-7860K - a quad-core CPU armed with, arguably, a best-in-class GPU. Intel, on the other hand, has a stronger CPU component but a weaker GPU that, for most, is hidden if using a discrete video card.

Yet purchasing a processor also requires thought into the supporting components such as motherboards, and this is where a raft of newer Intel chipsets steal a small march over their AMD rivals.

AMD has wrung all it can out of the existing Kaveri APU architecture, streamlined to 65W TDP in this case, so the A10-7860K remains a competent processor for the mainstream PC market. If you plan to use it alone, without a separate video card, for budget reasons, it's a good a bet as any APU available. For those who want budget systems with a quality add-in video card would probably do better with the Intel solution.

The Good
 
The Bad
New cooler is quieter
Best-in-class IGP
Doesn't break the bank
 
Single-threaded perf not great
Supporting chipset isn't as modern

HEXUS.where2buy*

The AMD A10-7860K is available from Scan Computers.

HEXUS.right2reply

At HEXUS, we invite the companies whose products we test to comment on our articles. If any company representatives for the products reviewed choose to respond, we'll publish their commentary here verbatim.



*UK-based HEXUS community members are eligible for free delivery and priority customer service through the SCAN.care@HEXUS forum.



HEXUS Forums :: 21 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
So you've tested an overclockable chip focused on graphics in a non-overclocked state against an unoverclockable chip focused on CPU power?

The integrated graphics results are interesting, but the rest of the article doesn't seem to have been thought through very well.

For me the most interesting comparison would have been against the other GPU focused £90-100 options. i.e. a £30-40 Haswell/Skylake Celeron or Pentium and a £60 GT 730 GDDR5. How much CPU performance, if any, do you lose? How do the graphics compare?
EndlessWaves
So you've tested an overclockable chip focused on graphics in a non-overclocked state against an unoverclockable chip focused on CPU power?

They have compared chips from different companies that come in at a similar price point. Both chips have IGP and multiple cores.

You're over-thinking the purpose of the article.
The memory frequency is a weird one. My MSI mobo says it will only support 2133mhz, however the board and the 7870k actually support 2400mhz (which is currently running perfectly as I'm typing). The memory is limited via BIOS. I flashed my BIOS and could no longer run at 2400mhz so I quickly rolled back and re-gained performance.
Would have liked to have seen some overclocked figures especially with the new heat sink and fan. Every CPU I buy normally includes a £15-£20 cooler by default.
I could love to see some applications performance in those reviews, like how the CPU can handle photoshop and other pro apps.