Intel warns Broadwell processors will be delayed

by Mark Tyson on 16 October 2013, 10:45

Tags: Intel (NASDAQ:INTC)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qab33j

Add to My Vault: x

Chipmaker Intel published its third quarter financial results last night showing that profits were down slightly on the same period last year. The part of the business providing chips for desktops and laptops saw a fall in sales of 3.5 per cent, however that drop was cushioned by record sales for Intel's data centre business which were up 12 per cent. Intel also took this opportunity to inform us that, due to "technical setbacks," preparations for the production of its 14nm Broadwell chips will be delayed by about three months.

"The third quarter came in as expected, with modest growth in a tough environment," said Intel CEO Brian Krzanich. "We're executing on our strategy to offer an increasingly broad and diverse product portfolio that spans key growth segments, operating systems and form factors. Since August we have introduced more than 40 new products for market segments from the Internet-of-Things to datacenters, with an increasing focus on ultra-mobile devices and 2 in 1 systems."

Intel's revenue figure for Q3 2013 was $13.5 billion, from which it managed to glean $3 billion in profit. Comparing the results to figures for the same period last year showed that profits were slightly down. However Intel was keen to highlight that Q3 was a lot better for its business than Q2 this year, due to the launch of Haswell chips and their increasing incorporation into computer systems.

Broadwell: A small blip in the schedule

Krzanich told investors in a conference call following the results publication about Intel's "strong desire to get Broadwell to the market," however he had to tell them about "a small blip in the schedule". The Intel CEO added that "We're not happy with the one-quarter push but it does point to how difficult these problems are to solve."

CFO Stacy Smith told investors that the delay wouldn't affect gross margins in Q4 nor impact the competitiveness of Intel's product lineup, reports Reuters. However it is thought that the release of a large amount of cheaper Intel Bay Trail processor based devices, if well received, might eat into Intel's margins in the coming quarters.



HEXUS Forums :: 12 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
The problem with the latest Intel chips is there isn't really much of a reason to upgrade. I have a 2550k running at 4.5Ghz and there just isn't much need for anything faster for gaming or anything other than perhaps video encoding.
I guess it's another quarter for the competitors to get their 20nm processes producing goods so Intel aren't 4x ahead of 28nm products. AMD really need that ASAP, but they haven't even got 28nm high end CPUs on the market yet.
KrisWragg
The problem with the latest Intel chips is there isn't really much of a reason to upgrade. I have a 2550k running at 4.5Ghz and there just isn't much need for anything faster for gaming or anything other than perhaps video encoding.

Of course games are getting more multithreaded and there are still plenty of people compiling code or encoding video, I'd like to see Intel bring their >4 core offerings down into the mainstream. Doing so would also help with the heat situation as more cores at a slightly lower speed/voltage means lower heat output per core, but same heat output overall as there are more cores and because there are more there's also a bigger die area producing heat.
You just can't bring out new sockets every few months!
i3 i5 i7 have seen Socket 1156, 1155, 1150, 2011 and God knows what's next.
Socket 775 saw P4, Pentium D, Core2Duo, Quad core.
You need to design one socket and build processors for that socket over the next 5 years.

I have a i7 2600 and it's wayy fast for me.
I have a 4670K, and it's much better than what I had before. I mostly need the horsepower for emulation (for which Haswell provided a major boost over Sandy and Ivy) and rendering.